From: SPAMGUARDriker AT pipcom DOT com (Matt Riker)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Allegro: pack_fread()
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 09:59:16 -0500
Organization: Riker Software
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <MPG.f3bb4cf4c1b9909896c4@news>
References: <MPG DOT f3b0c7939c7dde59896c2 AT news> <34D15BD1 DOT 85340453 AT csun DOT edu>
Reply-To: SPAMGUARDriker AT pipcom DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.61.241.217
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

In article <34D15BD1 DOT 85340453 AT csun DOT edu>, rmb56313 AT csun DOT edu says:

 > AFAIK, however, if you're not going take advantage of the compression,
 > password, or datafile access capabilities of packfiles, there's really
 > no reason to use them at all.  It would only decrease the portability of
 > your code.  Also, it will add a flag (F_NOPACK_MAGIC) to the beginning
 > of the file, stating that it is, in fact, not compressed.  Instead, just
 > use the <stdio.h> equivalents.

Ahh, okay, thanks.

 > > *** Remove SPAMGUARD ***
 > > ***  when replying!  ***
 > No!

Has no one seen anyone else use this anti-spam technique? :)  Only 
necessary when replying by e-mail, of course.

____________________________
Matt Riker
SPAMGUARDriker AT pipcom DOT com
*** Remove SPAMGUARD ***
***  when replying!  ***