From: Michal Mertl <xmerm05 AT manes DOT vse DOT cz>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: What's wrong with -fverbose-asm?
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 15:18:55 +0100
Organization: Prague University of Economics
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.95.980129151343.5511A-100000@manes.vse.cz>
References: <34CFAB07 DOT 376F374C AT btg DOT bombardier DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: manes.vse.cz
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <34CFAB07.376F374C@btg.bombardier.com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 28 Jan 1998, Mario Deschenes wrote:

> Hi, everyone
> 
> I wondering if the -fverbose-asm option work properly or not.
> I've tested this simple program:
> 
> #include <stdio.h>
> 
> void main(void)
> {
>   printf("hello");
> }
> 
> And there's no difference in the test.s file whatever I do:
> gcc -S test.c
> or gcc -S -fverbose-asm test.c
> 
I thing you could use gcc -c -Wa,-ahldns=list_file_name test.c
It's not perfect because it contains also opcodes numeric values, but you can
get rid of it. You can run "expand list_file_name >tmpfile" (be sure dos
expand will not be executed) and then "cut -b23- tmpfile >finalfile". It
produces exactly what you want. The number after -b switch of cut is not real,
you have to find yourself, which column is the first one you like. You can
write a batchfile to pretify the output for you offcourse.

HTH

Michal "MiMe" Mertl
  xmerm05 AT vse DOT cz