From: qballlives AT aol DOT com (QBallLives)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Is RHIDE a good environment to use?
Date: 24 Jan 1998 12:54:56 GMT
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <19980124125401.HAA01365@ladder02.news.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder02.news.aol.com
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
References: <2 DOT 2 DOT 32 DOT 19980121183622 DOT 00708754 AT gate-i>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

>I have been following the posts of this group on and off for about a year
>now.  I know that there has been some debate as to which environment users
>of djgpp should use: RHIDE or EMACS?
>
RHIDE is excellent... I know nothing about EMACs... but I've heard it is
harder. (don't mean to offend anyone - that's what I heard)

>Which do you prefer?  and why?
>
RHIDE
>Is RHIDE virtually bug free now?
>
>
Have you EVER seen anything BUG FREE????

Is that your requirement as far as what to use?

I make DOS apps (for PCs of course) w/ RHIDE... although there are some
"quirks"... I really like using it w/ DJGPP....

Jim the loiterer
aloiterer AT juno DOT com
http://members.xoom.com/JimMcCue/index.htm