From: qballlives AT aol DOT com (QBallLives) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Is RHIDE a good environment to use? Date: 24 Jan 1998 12:54:56 GMT Lines: 25 Message-ID: <19980124125401.HAA01365@ladder02.news.aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder02.news.aol.com Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com References: <2 DOT 2 DOT 32 DOT 19980121183622 DOT 00708754 AT gate-i> To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk >I have been following the posts of this group on and off for about a year >now. I know that there has been some debate as to which environment users >of djgpp should use: RHIDE or EMACS? > RHIDE is excellent... I know nothing about EMACs... but I've heard it is harder. (don't mean to offend anyone - that's what I heard) >Which do you prefer? and why? > RHIDE >Is RHIDE virtually bug free now? > > Have you EVER seen anything BUG FREE???? Is that your requirement as far as what to use? I make DOS apps (for PCs of course) w/ RHIDE... although there are some "quirks"... I really like using it w/ DJGPP.... Jim the loiterer aloiterer AT juno DOT com http://members.xoom.com/JimMcCue/index.htm