From: Joshua Heyer <jheyer AT geocities DOT com DOT NO DOT SPAM>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Is RHIDE a good environment to use?
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 13:23:33 -0600
Organization: [poster's organization not specified]
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <34C64B34.F13EAD53@geocities.com.NO.SPAM>
References: <2 DOT 2 DOT 32 DOT 19980121183622 DOT 00708754 AT gate-i>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cronkite.means.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Alan Wilson wrote:

> I have been following the posts of this group on and off for about a year
> now.  I know that there has been some debate as to which environment users
> of djgpp should use: RHIDE or EMACS?
>
> Which do you prefer?  and why?

  I use RHIDE, because I learned 'C' with Borland's IDE's;  I've tried EMACS,
its very powerful, but it's just not what I'm used to.  Also EMACS is very
large.

>
>
> Is RHIDE virtually bug free now?

  Not unless there's a version later than 4.1 which stabilizes it.  Mostly
for me its the debugger, & that might be my fault.

>
>
> Thanks for your response.
>


************************************************************************
                 Joshua Heyer -- imwho AT hotmail DOT com
************************************************************************
Immortality -- a fate worse than death.
                -- Edgar A. Shoaff
************************************************************************