From: Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Guile again, and "no accepatable ld.."
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 1998 21:45:36 +0100
Organization: none provided
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <34B3E970.99DDC90E@gmx.net>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 980107111448 DOT 4858M-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host: isdn30.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Eli Zaretskii wrote :
> 
> something that I don't understand, and have never seen before.  (Why
> would a package care about the linker invoked by GCC?)

I donīt know anything about guile, but at least the next binutils
will have a test for ld and then for GNU ld in it. So this might
also the same problem here. At first examining the linker and then
checking, if it is the GNU linker.

Robert
-- 
******************************************************
* email:   Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>     *
* Post:    Am Berg 3, D-09573 Dittmannsdorf, Germany *
* WWW:     http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~sho/rho        *
******************************************************