From: luecking AT comp DOT uark DOT edu (Daniel Luecking) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Dual monitors with rhide? Date: 15 Dec 1997 23:06:12 GMT Organization: The University of Arkansas Lines: 33 Message-ID: <674d54$qth@picayune.uark.edu> References: <19971214071301 DOT CAA28133 AT ladder02 DOT news DOT aol DOT com> <670a5n$ibe AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca> <3493DBDF DOT BA86224 AT cornell DOT edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: comp.uark.edu To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk "A. Sinan Unur" writes: >Paul Derbyshire wrote: > >> you're in deep doodoo), or a certain editor-cum-operating-system I >> shall not name, which has a learning curve like e^x and a manual the >> size of a phone book and half as well organized ;-) >that is supported by neither theorey nor fact. it is not supported by >fact, because people do learn it. a learning curve such as e^x means >there will never be any learning. Actually it used to mean that in time x, an amount e^x is learned. But this would give the phrase "steep learning curve" the opposite of its common meaning. Therefore, it now seems to mean it takes time e^x to learn an amount x. > theoretically, for the concept of >'learning curve' to have any meaning, the function should probably be >strictly increasing and concave. Actually, neither of these needs to be true: strictly increasing would mean nothing can be forgotten, concave would mean one of two things: in the first interpretation I gave above, it would mean that less is learned in each successive unit of time. In the second interpretation it would mean more is learned. Neither of these is commonly true. There are usually periods of time where nearly nothing is learned, separated by short periods where learning advances very rapidly. -- Dan Luecking Dept. of Mathematical Sciences luecking AT comp DOT uark DOT edu University of Arkansas http://comp.uark.edu/~luecking/ Fayetteville, AR 72101