From: kurt DOT skauen AT funcom DOT com (Kurt Skauen)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Return Types for Constructors
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 1997 09:43:33 GMT
Organization: Funcom Oslo AS
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <66j3qt$98b$1@araga.funcom.com>
References: <01bd0366$cfe6d140$d744e4cf AT cadvision DOT com> <348BA5D2 DOT 503C AT rug DOT ac DOT be> <348c4260 DOT 323656 AT news DOT eunet DOT be>
Reply-To: kurt DOT skauen AT funcom DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Host: aga.funcom.com
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Dominique DOT Biesmans AT nospam DOT ping DOT be (please remove the nospam part)
(Dominique Biesmans) wrote:

>
>To the original poster : post your header declaration, otherwise
>something like this should always work :
>
>// declaration
>class A
>{
>// ...
>public:
>	A(): // default constructor
>// ...
>}
>
>A::A()
>{
>	// implementation
>}
>

No, it will not. This will propably emit
"return type specification for constructor invalid"
since you forgot to put a semi-colon at the end of the class
declaration. This will lead the compiler to think that the constructor
A::A() returns an instanse of class A.


/* kurt
 *
 * If the second was twice as long P400 would 
 * have been state of the art in year 998!
 */