From: Fabrice ILPONSE <fabrice AT trash DOT lip6 DOT fr>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Pointer to ... and a question
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 1997 16:11:16 +0100
Organization: Universites Paris VI/Paris VII - France
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <3486C814.5CB2@trash.lip6.fr>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 971202173056 DOT 12854A-100000 AT is> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT iB1 DOT 0 DOT 971203092559 DOT 7828E-100000 AT vtn1>
NNTP-Posting-Host: asim.lip6.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

William A. Barath wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> |> Is this documented to be the *only* difference?
> |
> |Of course, it's documented.  Here's a fragment from gcc's Info docs:
> |
> |  `-O3'
> |       Optimize yet more.  `-O3' turns on all optimizations specified by
> |       `-O2' and also turns on the `inline-functions' option.
> 
> Which will make your program faster if it doesn't bloat it to the point
> that it can no longer be efficiently cached...

	I always use the -O2 option. I prefer keeping the function call rather
inlining function that'll make my prog bigger (When i'm programming, i
allways take in account the function calls)!!

> 
> Wil Barath, aka WseM : "I feel as though I see my pen to write"
> Author of VPM, EDITPLN, and other VGA Planets support programs
> Visit my homepage! -------------> http://victoria.tc.ca/~wi534

-- 
	^ ^ ^
	| | |
	+-+-+	Fabrice ILPONSE
	  |	<fabrice AT asim DOT lip6 DOT fr>
	  |
	  |
	  -