From: ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA (Paul Derbyshire)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: rand() or random()
Date: 11 Nov 1997 17:35:20 GMT
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <64a50o$ffs@freenet-news.carleton.ca>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 971105114611 DOT 460F-100000 AT is> <3466e64d DOT 9875734 AT news DOT arcticnet DOT no>
Reply-To: ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA (Paul Derbyshire)
NNTP-Posting-Host: freenet3.carleton.ca
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk


Ove Kaaven (ovek AT arcticnet DOT no) writes:
> Well, those copyright issues seem somewhat confusing.
> Let's see... how legal is this implementation?
> 
> int rand(void)
> {
>  return random();
> }
> 

What about

int rand (void) {
  // Insert the code for random() here
}


--
    .*.  Where feelings are concerned, answers are rarely simple [GeneDeWeese]
 -()  <  When I go to the theater, I always go straight to the "bag and mix"
    `*'  bulk candy section...because variety is the spice of life... [me]
Paul Derbyshire ao950 AT freenet DOT carleton DOT ca, http://chat.carleton.ca/~pderbysh