Message-Id: <3.0.16.19971113193349.1c0f979a@hem1.passagen.se>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 21:50:54 -0500
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
From: Peter Palotas <blizzar AT hem1 DOT passagen DOT se>
Subject: Re: rand() or random()
Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Precedence: bulk

At 16.03 1997-11-13 +0200, you wrote:
>
>On Thu, 13 Nov 1997, Peter Palotas wrote:
>
>> Uhm... Excuse me, but does this mean that if I use random() in my programs
>> the binaries must display "This product includes software developed 
>> by.... "??
>
>Did I say I was no lawyer?
>
>However, observe this:
>
>> > * [...] (2) distributions including binaries display 
>> > * the following acknowledgement [...]
>> > * in the documentation or other materials provided with the distribution
>      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>So it's not the binaries that must display the acknowledgement, it's the 
>docs and the ads *included* in the binary distribuition.

Well, this doesn't sound too good to me anyway.  I mean, isn't libc
supposed to be totally free?


-- Peter Palotas alias Blizzar -- blizzar AT hem1 DOT passagen DOT se --

*****************************************************
* A brief description of DJGPP:                     *
* NEVER BEFORE HAS SO FEW DONE SO MUCH FOR SO MANY! *
*****************************************************