From: "John M. Aldrich" <fighteer AT cs DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: what's "foo"?
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 1997 07:37:44 +0000
Organization: Two pounds of chaos and a pinch of salt
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <3462C548.1E3E@cs.com>
References: <01bceabf$55b66080$150867d1 AT default>
Reply-To: fighteer AT cs DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp203.cs.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

test wrote:
> 
> I've seen "foo" poping up in lot of djgpp and at&t unix documentations. Why
> is this obsesion with this word? I wonder if this is somekind of insider
> jargon?

"foo", like "bar" and sometimes "baz", is simply a placeholder.  It
implies that whatever is named "foo" can be replaced by whatever is
appropriate in a specific circumstance.  For example:

   To compile a program, type "gcc -o foo.exe foo.c".

In this case, 'foo' would be replaced with whatever your program's name
is.

This little bit of jargon is standard throughout the computer trade,
although I understand that different languages use different terms.  I'm
quite sure that a quick web search for "jargon" would turn up any of a
dozen net dictionaries; I don't have any URLs handy at the moment.

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
| John M. Aldrich, aka Fighteer I |     mailto:fighteer AT cs DOT com      |
| Descent 2: The Infinite Abyss - The greatest Internet game of all |
| time just got better!  This time, you're going all the way down...|
---------------------------------------------------------------------