Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 16:54:15 +0100 (MET)
From: Herman Geza <geza AT inf DOT bme DOT hu>
To: Cesar Scarpini Rabak <csrabak AT dce03 DOT ipt DOT br>
cc: Fabrice ILPONSE <fabrice AT asim DOT lip6 DOT fr>,
        djgpp users group <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: Watcom vs DJGPP
In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.32.19971103185401.006f5e38@dce03.ipt.br>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.971104164931.22372B-100000@kempelen.inf.bme.hu>
References: <1 DOT 5 DOT 4 DOT 32 DOT 19971103185401 DOT 006f5e38 AT dce03 DOT ipt DOT br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 3 Nov 1997, Cesar Scarpini Rabak wrote:

> At 15:43 03/11/97 +0100, Fabrice ILPONSE wrote:
> >Hi!
> [....] 
> >	WATCOM programs are faster than DJGPP ones!
> 
> Not enough details! How were the Watcom programs compiled/linked? Did you
> try with the same environment, i. e., extended DOS?

	Yes. It's true. WATCOM programs are faster(or the same speed) than
        DJGPP ones!

	It's a fact. I tried 7 programs, and WATCOM ones ran faster
	than DJGPP ones( the src code are the same ). Not much, about 4%.
	DJGPP's codes have never been faster than WATCOM's ones.

				Bye,
					Geza