Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 10:58:14 +1100 From: Bill Currie Subject: Re: Bug in strip/djp/allegro (was: Re: Need information !!!) In-reply-to: <3.0.16.19971027122619.2a4fe606@hem1.passagen.se> To: Peter Palotas , djgpp AT delorie DOT com Message-id: <199710272155.KAA16482@teleng1.tait.co.nz gatekeeper.tait.co.nz> Organization: Tait Electronics Limited MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Comments: Authenticated sender is Precedence: bulk On 27 Oct 97 at 12:26, Peter Palotas wrote: > Okay, now I have reproduced an error that only occurs using strip, > before using djp on a file. I think the bugs I've encountered always > came when using strip in a combination with djp, however I'm not > sure of this. This is correct. Using strip on a stubbed coff file shifts the section contents by about 2k and djp doesn't handle this properly. When using djp, it isn't neccessary to strip the exe as it seems djp does this itself (it only reads in the .text and .data sections, leaving anything else out). Bill -- Leave others their otherness.