From: "Charles Sandmann" <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: CWSDPMI Error?
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997  9:35:56
Organization: Aspen Technology, Inc.
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <344dc8fc.sandmann@clio.rice.edu>
References: <Pine DOT GSO DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 971020202746 DOT 26137A-100000 AT ural2>
Reply-To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: nboal2.dmccorp.com
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

> 	but error is error... So, there is a function 0x0801 of DPMI.
> 	CWSDPMI is returning the value of 0x0801 always, so the
> 	   __dpmi_free_physical_mapping is ALWAYS returning -1.

As it should - since dpmi_free_physical_mapping (0x801) is a dpmi 1.0
feature which CWSDPMI doesn't support.  Don't use this call.  I can't
think of a real good reason to support it.