From: michael DOT mauch AT gmx DOT de (Michael Mauch)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: RHIDE SUGGESTION
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 1997 19:26:02 +0200
Organization: Gerhard-Mercator-Universitaet -GH- Duisburg
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <34393cb5.3644856@news.uni-duisburg.de>
References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 16 DOT 19971004100406 DOT 34f71556 AT hem1 DOT passagen DOT se>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp89.uni-duisburg.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 5 Oct 1997 01:31:16 GMT, Peter Palotas
<blizzar AT hem1 DOT passagen DOT se> wrote:

> >How about if you can predefine some options for the compiler and can change
> >it whenever you want?
> >
> >For example:
> >Build a template for compilation with full optimization for final product.
> >Build a template for compilation with debug information.
> >
> >Then you can change the options by selecting one of this templates easily,
> >so you can compile with the current options in the template selected.
> >
> >I personally think it would be useful for me, I dont know if it would be
> >useful for other people, maybe yes.
> 
> I like this idea alot... So yes, other people will have use for this. (i.e.
> me ;)

Yes, I like the idea, too. I think this would mean to split the *.gpr
files in two parts, where one of the parts holds all the source files
(maybe with some special options) and the other one holds all the
options for either the debugging or the delivery version.

I think there's no need to have such a complicated option hierarchy like
Borland prefers to have since BC++4, that's more trouble than advantage.

Regards...
		Michael