From: Robert Hoehne Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: uname and processor type? Date: Mon, 06 Oct 1997 10:35:13 +0200 Organization: TU Chemnitz-Zwickau Lines: 27 Message-ID: <3438A2C1.3FF2FF44@Mathematik.TU-Chemnitz.DE> References: <6100u0$i0t$1 AT star DOT cs DOT vu DOT nl> <612gqs$ar4$1 AT star DOT cs DOT vu DOT nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: pandora.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk Ruiter de M wrote: > > OK, let me explain why I ask this. It's not that *I* want to know what > processor I have (I already know that :), but people or programs > (config.guess) do. If they use 'uname' they don't want to know it's a > PC (MS-DOS for OS says enough about that), but also what processor > is used. The newest config.guess knows about DJGPP and it reports always 'i386-pc-msdosdjgpp'. (because uname prints pc instead of the processor). But I think this really not so important because there are only some few GNU packages which really depend on the host or target system (gcc, gdb, binutils, ..). If you want to build such a package for an specific processor, simply overwrite the system name on commandline like configure --host=i686-pc-msdosdjgpp Robert -- ***************************************************************** * Robert Hoehne, Fakultaet fuer Mathematik, TU-Chemnitz-Zwickau * * Post: Am Berg 3, D-09573 Dittmannsdorf * * e-Mail: Robert DOT Hoehne AT Mathematik DOT TU-Chemnitz DOT DE * * WWW: http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~rho * *****************************************************************