Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 10:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Craig Berry <cberry AT cinenet DOT net>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
cc: "Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT edu DOT ar>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: RHIDE debugging woes
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970918120658.1776C-100000@is>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970918102224.18141A-100000@hollywood.cinenet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 18 Sep 1997, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> On Wed, 17 Sep 1997, Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET) wrote:
> 
> > > I'm not sure if this is the same problem, but I had user reports which
> > > seem to indicate that Windows 3.11 (not 3.10, which I think doesn't
> > > exist) 
> > I don't understand the sentence in paretheses, do you really think that Win 
> > 3.10 doesn't exists?. If yes, it DOES exists.
> 
> AFAIK, there's Windows 3.0, there's Windows 3.1, and there's
> Windows 3.11.  I have never heard of Windows 3.10.

Win 3.1 == Win 3.10.  Win 3.11 == (Win 3.10 + Win32s)

> > So seems that some thing is sure: Win32s replaces the disk access routines.
> 
> Which ones?

Yes, I'm curious about this too.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
   |   Craig Berry - cberry AT cinenet DOT net
 --*--    Home Page: http://www.cinenet.net/users/cberry/home.html
   |      Member of The HTML Writers Guild: http://www.hwg.org/   
       "Every man and every woman is a star."