Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 12:07:30 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: "Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT edu DOT ar>
cc: Craig Berry <cberry AT cinenet DOT net>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: RHIDE debugging woes
In-Reply-To: <m0xBIDO-000S1vC@inti.edu.ar>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970918120658.1776C-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 17 Sep 1997, Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET) wrote:

> > I'm not sure if this is the same problem, but I had user reports which
> > seem to indicate that Windows 3.11 (not 3.10, which I think doesn't
> > exist) 
> I don't understand the sentence in paretheses, do you really think that Win 
> 3.10 doesn't exists?. If yes, it DOES exists.

AFAIK, there's Windows 3.0, there's Windows 3.1, and there's
Windows 3.11.  I have never heard of Windows 3.10.

> So seems that some thing is sure: Win32s replaces the disk access routines.

Which ones?