Message-Id: <m0x8OpQ-000S1uC@inti.edu.ar>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <salvador AT natacha DOT inti DOT edu DOT ar>
From: "Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT edu DOT ar>
Organization: INTI
To: Nate Eldredge <eldredge AT ap DOT net>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 15:16:12 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: The is world dropping MS-DOS. What about DJGPP? (Was Re
Precedence: bulk

Nate Eldredge <eldredge AT ap DOT net> wrote:
> >So it's not the way the filesystem is layed out on the disk that
> >matters, it's how the file I/O is implemented in the OS.
> It seems there is some difference, though, since Linux takes about twice as
> long to do the same stuff on an msdos file system as on e2fs. I realize
> they're different drives, and one may well be significantly faster than the
> other. The native MSDOS loses big, although I think the drive is fairly
> fragmented.
In Linux the FAT support is pretty slow because NO BODY wants to optimize it!
Linux is pretty fast in disk access because it uses ALL the memory as cache 
(like in Lose 95 but better implemented). Another thing (even when you didn't 
it) never try to compare a DJGPP program running on DOS v.s. the same program 
compiled on Linux if the program uses heavilly the disk, the Linux version is 
MUCH more faster for a lot of reasons (no real mode switch is the most 
important I guess).

SET 
------------------------------------ 0 --------------------------------
Visit my home page: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Alternative e-mail: set-sot AT usa DOT net - ICQ: 2951574
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA
TE: +(541) 759 0013