From: Weiqi Gao <weiqigao AT a DOT crl DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: DJGPP Version 3
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 1997 10:24:18 -0500
Organization: Spectrum Healthcare Services
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <34098CA2.66997353@a.crl.com>
References: <199708290145 DOT VAA02562 AT delorie DOT com> <5u62aa$9jf AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca> <34092B69 DOT 25FAD991 AT phs DOT mat-su DOT k12 DOT ak DOT us>
NNTP-Posting-Host: a116019.stl1.as.crl.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Kevin Dickerson wrote:
> 
> Even if the DJGPP project won't be expanded to v3, it *is* being updated
> fairly irregularly, right? (i.e. newer revisions/patchnumbers?) It would
> be a shame if the greatest compiler for the DOS (and Unix) platform is
> discontinued. :(

As long as it serves its purpose, a program DOES NOT need to be updated
at all.  Look at TeX.  It's on a once every four years update schedule
right now.  The last release updated only a few lines of code.  The next
release is not due until the year 2000.  Yet it's tremendously useful
and powerful.

For free software at least, this has to be the "business model".  You
spend five to ten years writing a program and make it perfect.  And you
move on to other things, knowing full well that your program will
sustain itself through the years.

By the way, how do you discontinue something like DJGPP?  Stop selling
it?

--
Weiqi Gao
weiqigao AT a DOT crl DOT com