From: Kevin Dickerson Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: rhide bug... er... FEATURE! Date: Sun, 31 Aug 1997 00:47:08 -0800 Organization: Internet Alaska Inc. Lines: 42 Message-ID: <34092F8C.48D00878@phs.mat-su.k12.ak.us> References: <34001A31 DOT 3674 AT wanadoo DOT fr> <34056467 DOT 305629E6 AT Mathematik DOT TU-Chemnitz DOT DE> <340a1a83 DOT 6605828 AT news DOT bconnex DOT net> NNTP-Posting-Host: penaltybox13.alaska.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk Mad Pete wrote: > > Except under Windows. Windows uses Ctrl-C to copy text, Ctrl-X to cut > text, and Ctrl-V to paste text. This was an imitation of the Apple's > keywords which uses Alt-C, Alt, X, and Alt-V instead. So if a > windows programmer should decide to use RHide... :) (Even the new > DOS edit uses these key mappings for the same functions as well). One > thing to keep in mind is that TC++ came out before Windows95, so it's > up to you to decide whether to keep RHide strictly a clone (ahem) of > Turbo C++ or improve on it :) Trust microsoft to stick to > non-standard standards.... Actually, I myself prefer the venerable Edit over every single editor I've ever used. It takes a millisecond to load, has multiple cut, paste (etc.) key commands (i.e. CTRL-C & SHIFT-DELETE both cut a block) and you can open multiple files & switch windows very easily. IMHO, Robert, you should ponder including user-defined keys, or a key config file, or something, that way us stubborn people would find it much easier to adapt to it's strange and alien ways. :-) BTW, There is no way I'm trashing RHIDE, IMHO it has no equal in just about any aspect. Except Edit. I absolutely love 80x25 mode! Yay! :-) > Another windows/DOS thing I'm used to is when I mark a block of text, > I'm used to hitting delete to delete the block of text. Under TC++ > and therefore RHide, it doesn't delete the block of text, but rather > whatever character is after the block. I've always wondered why TC++ > did it this way (ie what's the advantage of not deleting the block but > the char after the block instead?) Maybe it would be nice to add an > environment option that you can toggle using delete or backspace to > delete a marked block of text... Actualy, that is a good suggestion. I've found that whenever I use RHDIE, I accidentally delete half my code from using the delete key in the wrong way. :-) --------------------------------- Kevin Dickerson kevind AT phs DOT mat-su DOT k12 DOT ak DOT us Webmaster of Palmer High School phs.mat-su.k12.ak.us ---------------------------------