From: Vik Heyndrickx <Vik DOT Heyndrickx AT rug DOT ac DOT be>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: complex numbers, correct ??
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 1997 13:24:37 +0200
Organization: University of Ghent, Belgium
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <3406B175.35AB@rug.ac.be>
References: <5tsl8i$ce$1 AT news DOT IAEhv DOT nl> <Pine DOT SGI DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970827160403 DOT 12574A-100000 AT atmosp DOT physics DOT utoronto DOT ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eduserv1.rug.ac.be
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Peter Berdeklis wrote:
> 
> On 25 Aug 1997, Jos Bergervoet wrote:
> 
> >     complex    a, b, c;
> >     a = complex(23.4, 26.9);
> >     b = (a+2)/(a+3);
> >     printf( "Hello: result = (%10.4g,%10.4g)\n", b );
> 
> By the way, if the code fragment you give above works on other compilers
> dump them!  This would be a compiler bug.
No, it wouldn't. With a little modification this also "works" on djgpp
and the compiler won't complain unless you set a specific warning option
(dump djgpp?). 
It yields undefined behaviour though.

-- 
+----------------+
| Vik Heyndrickx |
+----------------+