Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 09:51:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: Peter Berdeklis <peter AT atmosp DOT physics DOT utoronto DOT ca>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: complex numbers, correct ?? 
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970828123543.10704J-100000@is>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.91.970828094953.7746A-100000@atmosp.physics.utoronto.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 28 Aug 1997, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Aug 1997, Peter Berdeklis wrote:
> 
> > By the way, if the code fragment you give above works on other compilers 
> > dump them!  This would be a compiler bug.
> 
> GCC supports complex type in C programs also, but there's no need to dump 
> it ;-).

I didn't mean the availability of complex Eli.  I meant that if the printf
statement he provided worked the way he wrote it, that was a bug. 

---------------
Peter Berdeklis
Dept. of Physics, Univ. of Toronto