From: "Charles Sandmann" <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: generating 16-bit code (286 and lower)
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1997 21:37:25
Organization: Aspen Technology, Inc.
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <3401fb15.sandmann@clio.rice.edu>
References: <199708251146 DOT OAA16460 AT kruuna DOT Helsinki DOT FI>
Reply-To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: nboal2.dmccorp.com
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

> : If someone had that much time and energy, it would be much better to
> : re-write it using the work of Morten Welinder, PMODE, and CWSDPMI into
> : a DPMI server which ran mostly in 32-bit protected mode itself, with only
> : enough 16-bit code to load itself.
> 
> Actually, DJ has already stated this to be an eventual goal (see
> 	http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/history.html

A goal, yes.  But it will take hundreds of hours of someone's time.  Someone
needs to volunteer who has many months of free programming time to dedicate
to the task.  The person who really needs extra speed, extra memory, or DPMI 
1.0 features will be the one who does it.

> It's still important to have a free DPMI host with sources available (I need
> it, even if no one else does :-)

CWSDPMI isn't going away.  If I get time I might fix a couple of minor things.
But I don't have the time or need for a complete rewrite.  When people have
needed fixes in the past I have provided recompiled binaries (when they didn't
have a tcc/bcc/tasm setup).  For example, twice I have provided binaries which
would handle 256Mb and 1Gb of virtual memory.  But it would really be nice
if someone would do the rewrite :-)