From: firewind <firewind AT metroid DOT dyn DOT ml DOT org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Whatever
Date: 25 Aug 1997 23:37:45 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <5tt509$o6s@dfw-ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>
References: <19970825183100 DOT OAA00811 AT ladder02 DOT news DOT aol DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: elp-tx2-11.ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Mike4148 <mike4148 AT aol DOT com> wrote:
> Hey, I'm a veteran. In BTC++ 3.0 the little array index number you
> initialize an array with was the last element number. I'm not getting the
> book, by the way :).

"BTC++ 3.0" is not actually C then, but some sort of weird variant. The ANSI
standard for C says the last element in an array declared foo[x] will be
x-1.

-- 
[- 				 firewind	                            -]
[-   email: firewind AT metroid DOT dyn DOT ml DOT org (home), firewind AT aurdev DOT com (work)  -]
[- 	    "You're just jealous because the voices talk to -me-."          -]