From: "A. Sinan Unur" <asu1 AT cornell DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: unusual?
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1997 08:59:51 -0400
Organization: Cornell University http://www.cornell.edu
Lines: 32
Sender: asu1 AT cornell DOT edu (Verified)
Message-ID: <340181C7.1140@cornell.edu>
References: <33FFA678 DOT 3DD6F53E AT snet DOT net> <5tqiit$mff$1 AT vnetnews DOT value DOT net>
Reply-To: asu1 AT cornell DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: cu-dialup-0012.cit.cornell.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

> Joe Havelick (joe DOT h AT snet DOT net) wrote:
> : Does anyone know why the Djgpp group is under the os.msdos group, I
> : thought that os stood for operating system.

M. Schulter wrote: 

> Basically I would say -- just for myself -- that DJGPP comes close to
> being an OS in its own rights, and more specifically an implementation 
> of GNU tools in MS-DOS that I'm tempted to call DJGIX -- DJ's GNU *IX,
> maybe).

djgpp is a programming platform for msdos
msdos is an os

hence, comp.os.msdos.djgpp.

one could argue that it should have been
comp.os.msdos.programmer.tools.djgpp similar to
comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools.mfc etc but considering that the
number of groups under comp.os.msdos is really small compared to
comp.os.ms-windows, i do not think such a hierarchy would have been very
useful. besides, as margo also pointed out, djgpp is far more than a
specialized tool.
-- 
   Sinan
 
*******************************************************************
 A. Sinan Unur                                WWWWWW
                                              |--O+O
 mailto:sinan DOT unur AT cornell DOT edu                C   ^ 
 http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/asu1/     \  ~/ 
*******************************************************************