From: Meta <syzmik AT concentric DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: How fast is DJGPP?
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 01:03:53 -0400
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <33F92939.7800@concentric.net>
References: <199708190215 DOT WAA17192 AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To: syzmik AT concentric DOT net DOT NOSPAM
NNTP-Posting-Host: ts019d08.sag-mi.concentric.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

> No, they originally intended to distribute DJGPP as part of the add-on
> kit, until they decided to write QuakeC instead.  They couldn't do
> that with any other compiler.
> 
> During the development of quake, both id and djgpp benefited from the
> cooperation of our teams - both Quake and DJGPP became much faster and
> stable during that time, since all the experts were available to each
> other to work on improving them both.

What exactly did each benifit?