From: Paul Shirley <Paul AT no DOT spam DOT please>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: template classes with DJGPP
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 1997 13:20:09 +0100
Organization: wot? me?
Lines: 18
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <sIItVBA5rZ9zEwpS@foobar.co.uk>
References: <01bca10d$bb446600$0100a8c0 AT stefan DOT schimanski>
 <5s768v$n84$1 AT horus DOT mch DOT sni DOT de> <5sbrs1$k88 AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca>
 <33E9ACFD DOT 54D2A38E AT Mathematik DOT TU-Chemnitz DOT DE>
 <5sejhe$k6a AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca>
Reply-To: Paul Shirley <Paul AT chocolat DOT obvious DOT fake DOT foobar DOT co DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: chocolat.foobar.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

In article <5sejhe$k6a AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca>, Paul Derbyshire
<ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA> writes
>And as I recall, the C++ standard library *is* under the LGPL *except* for
>iostream.

First define 'C++ standard library'

I see libg++, the proprietary GNU C++ library (LGPL,definitely not
standard)
I see libiostream, LGPL special exemption (ie NOT LGPL in normal use
*because* its a de-facto standard)
I see the STL, copyright HP (so how could FSF restrict it?)

Is there another 'standard' lib I've missed?

---
Visit www.dukepsx.com: see what I do all day.
Paul Shirley: my email address is 'obvious'ly anti-spammed