Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 07:33:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1.5.4.16.19970819170452.3547702e@giasbga.vsnl.net.in> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: DJGPP From: Chirayu Krishnappa Subject: Re: Function Sizes Precedence: bulk Hi, >aware that you cannot be always sure that it will work. Subtle >changes in compiler optimizations in some future release could >rearrange functions and break this trick altogether. But then we need some way to lock functions in a compatible (with future compiler versions) manner. This seems to be the only method. Maybe the newer versions will allow for the Allegro marcos (END_OF_FUNCTION, LOCK_FUNCTION - defined in a different way) to still work and hence no code changes. Bye, Chirayu Krishnappa: ------------------ e-mail: chirayu AT radiolink DOT net or starling AT radiolink DOT net Phone: 91 080 3332616. -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. The woods are lovely, dark, and deep, But I have promises to keep, And miles to go before I sleep, And miles to go before I sleep. -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.