From: mert0407 AT sable DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk (George Foot) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: The DJGPP Oracle Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 23:29:09 GMT Organization: [posted via] Easynet Group PLC Lines: 37 Message-ID: <33f37ca0.48373528@news.easynet.co.uk> References: <19970813200900 DOT QAA21426 AT ladder02 DOT news DOT aol DOT com> <5stghq$i43$1 AT vnetnews DOT value DOT net> <33F31847 DOT 4B4440D2 AT alcyone DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: foot.easynet.co.uk To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk On Thu, 14 Aug 1997 07:37:59 -0700, Erik Max Francis wrote: >M. Schulter wrote: > >> Of course, reading the docs is only the starting point. People can miss >> details, misunderstand things, or fail to realize that a problem they >> perceive in one way is really synonymous with an issue covered in the >> FAQ >> or other DJGPP documentation under a different name. > >I make a distinction between someone who has looked at the README and the >FAQ and still doesn't understand (for whatever reason), and those that >haven't even bothered looking and want me to find the passage in the FAQ >for them. Yes; I think it's helpful to answer courteously nonetheless. For example, rather than saying `This is explained in section X.Y of the FAQ' and giving a short description, perhaps it's better to say `Search the FAQ [contents/index] for "zzzzzzz" and you'll find your answer'. I don't know, though; it seems more sociable (to the asker) to give the exact reference. Of course, saying that it's explained in section X of the FAQ (not giving the subsection number) would force the reader to look through the contents page, thus possibly seeing answers to many more questions they would otherwise have asked the next day. Perhaps a web-based version of this Oracle would be most effective at guiding FAQs away from the group; I don't think people really look at what they've installed on their hard drive. Then again, I wonder how many newbies here have bothered to read the DJGPP User's Guide; though incomplete, it is instructive and might be more what they're looking for in terms of documentation, rather than the lasagne-code FAQ :) -- george DOT foot AT merton DOT oxford DOT ac DOT uk