From: ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA (Paul Derbyshire)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: [Q] wrapping functions with linker
Date: 17 Aug 1997 09:04:28 GMT
Organization: The National Capital FreeNet
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <5t6eqs$h4q@freenet-news.carleton.ca>
References: <5stvfi$ffm$1 AT newton DOT pacific DOT net DOT sg> <33F43A43 DOT 6E6EF6B2 AT Mathematik DOT TU-Chemnitz DOT DE>
Reply-To: ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA (Paul Derbyshire)
NNTP-Posting-Host: freenet5.carleton.ca
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk



Why do that and muck with the library code? Just define a malloc() of your
own, same name, and the linker will not find it to be an unresolved symbol
and so will not use the library version.

--
    .*.  Where feelings are concerned, answers are rarely simple [GeneDeWeese]
 -()  <  When I go to the theater, I always go straight to the "bag and mix"
    `*'  bulk candy section...because variety is the spice of life... [me]
Paul Derbyshire ao950 AT freenet DOT carleton DOT ca, http://chat.carleton.ca/~pderbysh