Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
From: Peter Berdeklis <peter AT atmosp DOT physics DOT utoronto DOT ca>
Subject: Re: Linux to DOS Problem 
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.91.970812203007.27966B-100000@atmosp.physics.utoronto.ca>
Nntp-Posting-Host: chinook.physics.utoronto.ca
Sender: news AT info DOT physics DOT utoronto DOT ca (System Administrator)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Organization: University of Toronto - Dept. of Physics
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.3.91.970812201412.27484A-100000@atmosp.physics.utoronto.ca>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 00:32:03 GMT
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970810175343 DOT 4651X-100000 AT is>  <Pine DOT SGI DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970812201412 DOT 27484A-100000 AT atmosp DOT physics DOT utoronto DOT ca>
Lines: 19
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, Peter Berdeklis wrote:
> 
> The language definition specifies the value of uninitialized _auto_ 
> variables, but not of raw memory allocated by malloc or new.  This memory 
> is undefined.  That's where the problem with v1.x and v2.0 came from.
> 
> I think you both know this, but where discussing different things.

Did I say _auto_ variables!?!  I meant _static_ of course.

I don't know why I get into these things, I really don't.  I've really 
got to learn to keep my mouth shut.  (Yeah, that'll happen. :)

Sorry.  No flames please.

---------------
Peter Berdeklis
Dept. of Physics, Univ. of Toronto