From: Yojimbo <yojimbo AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Capturing DJGPP mesages to a file
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 1997 15:01:57 -0700
Organization: Netcom
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <33F4D1D5.3E2A@ix.netcom.com>
References: <33EA2692 DOT 395D AT popd DOT ix DOT netcom DOT com> <33EB7269 DOT 5F3C AT popd DOT ix DOT netcom DOT com> <5t25v8$3ks$1 AT vnetnews DOT value DOT net>
Reply-To: yojimbo AT ix DOT netcom DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Host: stl-wa14-14.ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

M. Schulter wrote:
> 
> Yojimbo (yojimbo AT popd DOT ix DOT netcom DOT com) wrote:
> : Unlike the redir utility provided with djgpp, script sends the output to
> : BOTH the screen and the file.
> :
> : Enjoy.
> :
> 
> Hi, there.
> 
> This is just to note that your viewpoint is in accord with Section 6.10 of
> my rather dated version of the DJGPP FAQ, which also specifically notes
> this advantage of script over other solutions, including redir (my
> generally preferred solution) and capturing output from GCC, say, to an
> Emacs buffer (a nice IDE feature):
> 
> "It has an advantage of saving everything that goes to screen *and*
> showing it on the screen at the same time."
> 
> As usual, Eli Zaretskii and the DJGPP team have given us a document that
> encourages users to make their own informed choice.
> 
> Most respectfully,

Boy, I am SO RELIEVED to find that my humble opinion is OK with the HOLY
WRIT.  

I want to be a groupie just like you.  Whose boots do I have to lick?  
Is there a section of the DJGPP FAQ that covers that too?  Does the
DJGPP FAQ list any dietary restrictions, and on what days of the week is
one to avoid compilation?  Is it true that the DJGPP FAQ teaches that
BASIC is a sin?

WE need no other writ!  For those books that disagree with the DJGPP FAQ
are heresy, and those that agree with it are fawning redundancies!

Most grovellingly, sycophantically yours. {offstage, we hear the sounds
of boots being licked}