From: Vic Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: mistake in COLOR enum in conio.h Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 17:02:42 -0400 Organization: Communications Accessibles Montreal, Quebec Canada Lines: 18 Message-ID: <33F220F2.11F4@cam.org> References: <97Aug6.153715gmt+0100 DOT 17056 AT internet01 DOT amc DOT de> <33EA937E DOT 7391 AT cam DOT org> <01bca44e$85b88cc0$LocalHost AT damien> NNTP-Posting-Host: dynamicppp-233.hip.cam.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk Rich Birch wrote: > > Vic wrote in article <33EA937E DOT 7391 AT cam DOT org>... > > No. not that. And not the following bull either.How come nobody sees > > that? It's SO f***ing obvious! > > LIGHTGRAY is in the DARK colors and DARKGRAY is in the LIGHT ones! > > Thank you. That's all I was getting at, and I wasn't making a serious > complaint like everyone seems to think I was. I was just pointing it out, > out of pure curiosity. Which, as it turns out, is not a mistake... Darkgray is light black and lightgray is dark white...whis confuses the hell outta me... not to be picki or anything, but why isn't orange dark yellow or pink light red ?? is there any hardware reason for the light/dark gray stuff ? -- --> http://www.cam.org/~tudor <-- Go ahead and build another Messiah We dig another grave...