From: Vic <tudor AT cam DOT org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Can GAS be substituted by NASM?
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 20:37:49 -0400
Organization: Communications Accessibles Montreal, Quebec Canada
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <33F101DD.6768@cam.org>
References: <33EFA744 DOT A747F53C AT technologist DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dynppp-217.hip.cam.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Andrew Delong wrote:
> 
> I learned the Intel asm syntax long before I knew of DJGPP (and, like
> many, I was abhorred at the AT&T syntax :)
Me too, but now I love it...I'm even thinking about starting programming
in ASM...:)
About GAS and NASM: You can write your ASM routines in NASM then compile
them in an object file(s) and include it in your project. I don't know
how you can do that from RHIDe. You can't completely replace GAS tho,
since all the DJGPP output is for it. You wouldn't want that anyways...
(good luck, and try to look into the AT&T syntax, it's not that
horrible...:)
> --
> // Andrew Delong
> //______________________________________________________________
> //Check out my hompage ... Great for graphics & DOS programming
> //http://www.osha.igs.net/~dandelong/nw/

-- 
--> http://www.cam.org/~tudor <--
Go ahead and build another Messiah
We dig another grave...