From: "A. Sinan Unur" <asu1 AT cornell DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: DirectX 5.0 Compatibilty
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 1997 09:12:46 -0400
Organization: Cornell University http://www.cornell.edu
Lines: 24
Sender: asu1 AT cornell DOT edu (Verified)
Message-ID: <33EC6CCE.5C6A@cornell.edu>
References: <33E95E03 DOT 67E6 AT concentric DOT net> <01bca3e3$a5976f40$bd86b7c2 AT glueck> <5sfrd9$shh AT mozo DOT cc DOT purdue DOT edu> <33eb9cc3 DOT 204136777 AT news DOT wam DOT umd DOT edu> <5sh9fv$ha8 AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca>
Reply-To: asu1 AT cornell DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: cu-dialup-0068.cit.cornell.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Paul Derbyshire wrote:

> Bandwidth has always been important, otherwise
>                         one wouldn't need to crusade against spam.

paul,

i find the directx posts annoying too. but what you are doing totally
defeats the purpose: you are posting meaningless replies to the djgpp
group where no one really gives a crap, and more importantly, none of
the cross-posters actually reads. so please, maybe contact them by
e-mail, or do something else, but try not to add to the problem.

the same goes for other people who reply to spam.

-- 
   Sinan
 
*******************************************************************
 A. Sinan Unur                                WWWWWW
                                              |--O+O
 mailto:sinan DOT unur AT cornell DOT edu                C   ^ 
 http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/asu1/     \  ~/ 
*******************************************************************