From: Vic <tudor AT cam DOT org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Allegro 3.0 Q:
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 1997 23:28:48 -0400
Organization: Communications Accesibles Montreal
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <33EA9270.6867@cam.org>
References: <5sbse2$kef AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca> <EEKLH3 DOT 1BA AT world DOT std DOT com>
Reply-To: tudor AT cam DOT org
NNTP-Posting-Host: dynppp-68.hip.cam.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

tob AT world DOT std DOT com wrote:
> Not exactly either. As I understand it, the WIP is expected to
> eventually become 3.0, and since it promises some appealing features and
> Allegro 2.2 (et al) is so damn good, people are understandably eager,
> but it doesn't exist as 3.0 *yet*.
Are the 3D routines gonna get faster?
-- 
--> http://www.cam.org/~tudor <--
Go ahead and build another Messiah
We dig another grave...