Date: Wed, 6 Aug 1997 11:14:10 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Art S. Kagel" <kagel AT ns1 DOT bloomberg DOT com>
To: "Lee, Sung-Tae" <leest96 AT dong DOT snu DOT ac DOT kr>
Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: djgpp vs lahey fortran
In-Reply-To: <33E82A6B.C0E518F2@dong.snu.ac.kr>
Message-Id: <Pine.D-G.3.91.970806111129.6551D-100000@dg1>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 6 Aug 1997, Lee, Sung-Tae wrote:

> Hi, I may be new djgpp-user(download djgpp because of memory trouble in
> Turbo-C 3.0).
> 
> I find that my code which run well in workstation(I don't know its
> capacity yet.)
> don't run in PC with 16M ram, Pentium133, Win95...
> 
> I wrote my code in standard-C.
> 
> Making .exe file is successful by 'djgpp'. But don't run. I want to make
> my code run well in PC.
> 
> Well, as you know, lahey fortran compiler use as large RAM as possible.
> Then, how is 'djgpp'?
> 
What version did you download?  This sounds suspiciously like 1.12.
DJGPP V1 did not generate .exe files directly you had to:

gcc -o myprog myproc.c
coff2exe myprog

To get myprog.exe which will run.   If you have V1, get V2 it is MUCH
MUCH better and more stable to boot and can generate .exe format files
directly.

Art S. Kagel, kagel AT bloomberg DOT com