Message-ID: <33E58719.6F13@post.comstar.ru>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 1997 11:39:06 +0400
From: Dim Zegebart <zager AT post DOT comstar DOT ru>
Reply-To: zager AT post DOT comstar DOT ru
Organization: Comstar Ltd.
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: DJGPP Mail List <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: Which is better... EMACS or RHIDE? [Shameless RHIDE plug]
References: <33DD805E DOT DF5783BC AT ix DOT netcom DOT com> <33DE1B61 DOT D8DABC92 AT a DOT crl DOT com> <5rscun$bkg AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Paul Derbyshire wrote:
> 
> NT. Emacs is allergic to Windows NT. NT must have stricter stuff to
> protect itself from memory hogs and viruses!)
You are not quite correct. I have port of Emacs to NT. It comes with
GIS system Small World and used by it like a shell.

-- 
Regards,
Dim Zegebart, 
Moscow Russia.
Ghostly basement : http://www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/pines/7817