From: "A. Sinan Unur" <asu1 AT cornell DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: fread/fwite return value
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 09:43:06 -0400
Organization: Cornell University
Lines: 17
Sender: asu1 AT cornell DOT edu (Verified)
Message-ID: <33DDF36A.2039@cornell.edu>
References: <199707161515 DOT AA104406147 AT typhoon DOT rose DOT hp DOT com> <33CD1946 DOT 2795 AT cornell DOT edu> <33DCD48B DOT 7FCF8736 AT alcyone DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Erik Max Francis wrote:
> 
> A. Sinan Unur wrote:
> 
> > that is at best worthless advice. the documentation in this case is
> > plain wrong. it is a small mistake, but fread is supposed to return 0 in
> > case of error.
> 
> Actually, fread (and fwrite) return the number of elements actually read
> (or written) -- an error condition is if this number is less than the
> number of elements you passed in.  Returning zero means _none_ of the
> elements got read (or written), but there are more failure cases than just
> that.

please guys, let it go. i corrected my stupid mistake several times
after that post.
  -- Sinan