From: James MacDonald Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Vesa 2.0 is slower than 1.2 on my video card !!!!! Date: Sun, 27 Jul 1997 10:57:15 +0100 Organization: Trills and Technologies Distribution: world Message-ID: References: <199707221500 DOT IAA26318 AT adit DOT ap DOT net> <33d79d82 DOT 403618 AT news1 DOT telepac DOT pt> <33d8d7a0 DOT 2209688 AT news1 DOT telepac DOT pt> <33da53b7 DOT 2937881 AT news1 DOT telepac DOT pt> <33db5521 DOT 3300648 AT news1 DOT telepac DOT pt> NNTP-Posting-Host: netbook.demon.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 Lines: 16 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk In article <33db5521 DOT 3300648 AT news1 DOT telepac DOT pt>, Ricardo Cunha scribbled : >P.S.: If what you said is true how can a board that doesn't supports >Vesa 1.2 support those calls simple by using UniBve? Easily. UniVBE >is< VESA 2.0! VESA is a software thing, as I said before. It interprets a setpixel() command or similar to a low level hardware write, independent of VESA. VESA is simply an API for programming video cards - so you don't have to write a gazillion different drivers. -- Revised anti-spam in use : remove X to reply - 'Xnetbook' becomes 'netbook' Anti-spam thermonuclear warheads cheap at only $300!