From: Benny <benny AT euronet DOT beNospam DOT thanks>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: NASM
Date: 27 Jul 1997 01:21:37 GMT
Organization: EuroNet Internet
Message-ID: <33DAA1C2.2801@euronet.beNospam.thanks>
References: <memo DOT 786087 AT cix DOT compulink DOT co DOT uk> <01bc9981$619ad820$f28033cf AT pentium>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dialwa013.ib.be
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 16
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

George Kinney wrote:
> 
> Richard Cobbett <corvus AT cix DOT compulink DOT co DOT uk> wrote in article
> <memo DOT 786087 AT cix DOT compulink DOT co DOT uk>...
> > In-Reply-To: <199707241624 DOT JAA27148 AT adit DOT ap DOT net>
> > Damn.  Thanks anyway.  Why is TASM so hard to find these days?
> 
> It's still available from all of the computer stores, and mail-order
> software companies I use. (It is a commercial product after all)

Once (I think) I saw a post about someone announcing he had converted
the NASM syntax to the TASM syntax, and available on his web page.

I don't remember the url though...

-- Benny.