From: Erik Max Francis <max AT alcyone DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Is this the normal behavior?
Followup-To: comp.lang.c
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 1997 16:16:07 -0700
Organization: Alcyone Systems
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <33AC60B7.132063A0@alcyone.com>
References: <33ABA2A0 DOT 539A AT sysnetway DOT com DOT br>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newton.alcyone.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Edevaldo wrote:

> It is more a C question than a DJGPP related one, but ...
>         When I execute this program:

This should have been posted to comp.lang.c.  Followups directed there.

> #include <stdio.h>
> 
> int main( void)
> {
>         int i;
> 
>         for( i=0; i<4; printf( "%i %i\n", i, i++) );
> 
>         return 0;
> };
	...
>         Is this the normal behavior?
>         In C the later arguments are evaluated first? The stack?

This is ANSI standard C.  In evaluating expressions, including function
call arguments, you have no assurance of which order they will be
evaluated in.  Thus using subexpressions that have side effects on other
subexpressions in the same expression, you will have undefined behavior.

-- 
       Erik Max Francis, &tSftDotIotE / email / max AT alcyone DOT com
                     Alcyone Systems /   web / http://www.alcyone.com/max/
San Jose, California, United States /  icbm / 37 20 07 N  121 53 38 W
                                   \
     "Covenants without the sword / are but words."
                                 / Camden