From: Andrew Crabtree <andrewc AT typhoon DOT rose DOT hp DOT com>
Message-Id: <199706202202.AA292534148@typhoon.rose.hp.com>
Subject: Re: DJGPP is in WAY too many pieces
To: mert0407 AT sable DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk (George Foot)
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 15:02:28 PDT
Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <5odi90$9mt@news.ox.ac.uk>; from "George Foot" at Jun 20, 97 9:24 am
Precedence: bulk

> Any comments and arguements for/against this distribution would be
> appreciated; personally at present I think it would be a good option to
> provide.

Anything that cuts down on posts like 

'I got djgpp but when I run it I get 

cannot exec as (ENOENT)'

Would be welcome.  How much of binutils did you cut out?  Objdump
(maybe nm) could be useful if they are small.

Andrew