From: Paul Shirley <Paul AT no DOT spam DOT please>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: PGCC dependability?
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 1997 15:37:09 +0100
Organization: wot? me?
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <UWSAmGAV+UpzEw$h@foobar.co.uk>
References: <33A3E85A DOT 1291 AT maties DOT sun DOT ac DOT za>
 <199706151714 DOT AA049164840 AT typhoon DOT rose DOT hp DOT com>
Reply-To: Paul Shirley <Paul AT chocolat DOT obvious DOT fake DOT foobar DOT co DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: chocolat.foobar.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Lines: 15
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

In article <199706151714 DOT AA049164840 AT typhoon DOT rose DOT hp DOT com>, Andrew
Crabtree <andrewc AT typhoon DOT rose DOT hp DOT com> writes
>> Has anyone encountered any problems?
>Everything I've seen so far has been configuration problems (by me 
>for alignment and stack), or known bugs (see the FAQ for what is known
>not to work).  I've seen a couple other posts, but requests for more
>info have drawn blanks.

I crashed the compiler on my first test using -O3, probably related to
the 3000+ line switch statement it contains (*I did not write that part
of the program). At a guess I'd say code that stretches djgpp's limits
is going to break pgcc occasionally.

---
Paul Shirley: my email address is 'obvious'ly anti-spammed