From: Erik Max Francis <max AT alcyone DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: char **argv vs. char *argv[]
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 08:52:02 -0700
Organization: Alcyone Systems
Message-ID: <33A01B22.6C1AC64@alcyone.com>
References: <5ndap9$mgd AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca> <01bc74bd$7df85940$e38033cf AT pentium> <5ngpcv$a6v$3 AT sun1000 DOT pwr DOT wroc DOT pl> <339BFF1F DOT 4897 AT cornell DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newton.alcyone.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 19
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

A. Sinan Unur wrote:

> uh-um ... what does that mean? no offense, but where exactly do you get
> the notion that
    ...
> will generate a warning? these types of discussions belong in
> comp.lang.c (and probably they are in the C FAQ.)

He was claiming that the array name of an array argument is not a
modifiable lvalue, which is a different thing.  This in, however,
incorrect.

-- 
       Erik Max Francis, &tSftDotIotE / email / max AT alcyone DOT com
                     Alcyone Systems /   web / http://www.alcyone.com/max/
San Jose, California, United States /  icbm / 37 20 07 N  121 53 38 W
                                   \
     "Covenants without the sword / are but words."
                                 / Camden