From: hesslinm AT pigeon DOT qut DOT edu DOT au (hessling mark )
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Eli Z., is pdcurs23 stable?
Date: 11 Jun 1997 03:34:28 GMT
Organization: Queensland University of Technology, Australia
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <5nl6c4$nc8@dove.qut.edu.au>
References: <3391EB15 DOT 796D AT primenet DOT com>
Reply-To: M DOT Hessling AT qut DOT edu DOT au
NNTP-Posting-Host: pigeon.qut.edu.au
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 23
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Smith A. Cat (imbe AT primenet DOT com) wrote:
: I guess this is really a question for Eli, but maybe has some general
: interest: (and since i goofed on sed 2.XX!)

: is there a reason NOT to use the 2.3 release of PDCURSES??

: phil

Hi Phil,

The principal reason that PDCurses 2.3 is a beta, is that I intend
waiting until the slk_*() functions are complete before releasing it.
As long as you don't require them, then the 2.3 beta is going to be as
stable as the release version. 

Cheers, Mark
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Mark Hessling                 Email:             M DOT Hessling AT qut DOT edu DOT au
 PO Box 203                    Phone:                    +617 3802 0800
 Bellara                          http://www.lightlink.com/hessling/
 QLD 4507                      **** Maintainer PDCurses & REXX/SQL ****
 Australia                     ************* Author of THE ************
------------------------------------------------------------------------