From: "Charles Sandmann" <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Thanks for CWSDPMI
Date: Mon,  9 Jun 1997 21:32:18
Organization: Aspen Technology, Inc.
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <339c7662.sandmann@clio.rice.edu>
References: <5nhpj5$bjo$1 AT vnetnews DOT value DOT net>
Reply-To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: spica.dmccorp.com
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

> Funny how that "Absolutely No Warranty" message actually gives a certain
> sense of security <grin>.

Thanks for the words of support - my message really was in total humor.

I really don't care if people blame CWSDPMI for all their bugs - I know
where the bugs might be (places where I cheated a bit) and where they 
aren't.  I'm quite comfortable in saying PMODE/DJ is faster for interrupt
handling, is a better ring 0 host, and has a neat imbedded stub.  

I actually find it very funny when people complain about page faults and
conclude it must be some bug in CWSDPMI since it doesn't happen under
windoze :-)

By that same analogy, all of the bugs I'm dealing with over the last
couple of months must be bugs in HP/UX since it worked under VMS :-)
Somehow, I don't think HP would believe that :-)