From: "A. Sinan Unur" <asu1 AT cornell DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Random numbers/George
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 1997 14:14:47 -0400
Organization: Cornell University
Sender: asu1 AT cornell DOT edu (Verified)
Message-ID: <3395B097.5077@cornell.edu>
References: <2 DOT 2 DOT 32 DOT 19970604162434 DOT 0069d50c AT gate>
Reply-To: asu1 AT cornell DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 14
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Alan Wilson wrote:
 
> It sounds like to me that DJGPP doesnt have a truly random generator > then.
> "Informal" random numbers are nice but it would be better if we could
> generate truly random numbers where the frequency of all numbers were > the same...

i guess ignorance is indeed bliss.

this has nothing to do with DJGPP. as has been pointed out very clearly
in previous responses to you, all computer generated random numbers are
pseudo-random. (by the way, the only random distribution is _not_ the
unifrom distribution.)

 -- Sinan