Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 19:28:10 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Daniel TAUPIN <taupin AT lps DOT u-psud DOT fr>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: stubify versus coff2exe
In-Reply-To: <33960A83.1C5C@lps.u-psud.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970604192735.3865D-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 4 Jun 1997, Daniel TAUPIN wrote:

> > Personally, I think that this is not such a big problem, since there are
> > a lot of DPMI hosts out there (e.g., any kind of Windows) which will all
> > do.
> 
>  My viewpoint is definitely opposite: when I provide somebody with an
> *.exe file,
> it MUST work whatever the config he hase, especially if he as some
> obsolete DOS, some obsolete WINDOWS, some obsolete processor, provided
> it is a 386 or more.

Just include CWSDPMI.EXE with your program, that's all.